Un adulto ensena a una nina a montar en bici, acompanando un primer paso

Blog · Families · 7 min

What age should a kid get a phone?

There is no right age, and no serious body publishes one. What exists is a different set of questions: is this particular child ready, are the other families in the class holding any kind of line, and are you handing over a phone or handing over social media, because those are two decisions and most homes make them on the same afternoon by accident.

An adult teaching a girl to ride a bike, staying alongside her for the first attempt

You are here because the question has landed. Maybe your child put it there, in the form of everyone in my class has one. Maybe you put it there yourself, when you noticed the plans for Saturday were being made in a group chat your child is not in. Either way you are not late and you are not early. You are deciding, which is the job. So here is the part most articles skip: the honest answer about age, and then the thing that actually determines how the next three years go.

What age should a kid get a phone? The honest answer

Short version: there isn't one, and the guides that give you a number are giving you the average of a group your child is not a member of.

This is not a dodge. It is where the paediatric bodies have landed after a decade of being asked. The American Academy of Pediatrics no longer opens with a number for anything in this territory; the first question in its current framework is simply which child. A settled twelve-year-old who tells you things and a fourteen-year-old who has been having a hard year are not the same case, and a rule pitched at the average of them fits neither.

What people mean when they ask for an age is usually something more practical: at what point does this stop being a thing I am doing to my child and start being a thing I am doing for them. That point is real, and it usually arrives when two things land together. The child starts moving through the world alone, walking to school, meeting friends without an adult attached. And their social life migrates onto a screen more or less overnight. When both are true, a phone is doing a job. When only the second is true, it is doing a different job, and it is worth being honest about which.

Before you carry on, hold onto one thing. Age decides when. What decides how it goes is the state the phone is in when it arrives.

Better questions than how old are they

Swap the age question for these. They take five minutes and they will tell you more than any chart.

  • Does your child tell you when something has gone wrong, or does it reach you three weeks later through somebody else's mother? This one matters more than all the others put together. A phone will bring uncomfortable things into their life. The question is whether the uncomfortable thing gets to you.
  • Can they put something down when they said they would? Not always. Sometimes, without a scene.
  • Do they lose things? A phone is not a test of character but it is a test of the boring kind of responsibility, and there is no shame in a child who is not there yet.
  • What is the actual need? Write it in one sentence. If the sentence is so I can reach them on the way home, a phone that does calls and maps answers it completely.
  • What happens at night in your house? Where devices sleep is the single decision with the most downstream effect, and it is much easier to set on day one than to claw back in month six.

None of those questions has a number in it. That is the point. A child who answers them well at eleven is more ready than a child who answers them badly at fourteen, and everyone who knows both children can see it.

Wait Until 8th, and why this is not your decision alone

Here is the part that gets left out of every readiness checklist, and it is the reason those checklists so often fail in practice.

Your child is not wrong. When they say they are being left out of where the plans get made, that is usually true, and treating it as manipulation will cost you the conversation. The pressure is real, it is social, and one family cannot absorb it alone. Which is exactly the insight behind the movement that has done more than anything else in the English-speaking world to shift this: Wait Until 8th.

The idea is deceptively simple. Parents sign a pledge to hold off on a smartphone until at least the end of 8th grade, roughly thirteen or fourteen, the end of Year 9 in England. More than 155,000 parents have now signed. But the mechanism is the clever bit, and it is worth understanding even if you never sign anything: the pledge does not activate until at least ten families from your child's grade and school have signed it too. Below ten, you are on your own and the pledge stays dormant. At ten, it becomes a fact about the class rather than a rule about your household.

That design admits something most parenting advice will not. Willpower at the level of one family does not beat a social norm. Ten families beat it easily, because now the sentence in your kitchen is not I am the only one whose parents say no. It is that a good chunk of the year group is in the same position, which is a completely different sentence for a twelve-year-old to have to live with.

You do not have to join anything to use this. Message four parents from the class and ask what they are doing about phones. Several of them have usually been waiting for someone else to raise it first, which is how norms work: everyone privately holds a position they think they hold alone.

A phone and social media are two different decisions

Short version: you can hand over a phone at one age and social apps at another, and the law only has an opinion about the second one.

There is a persistent confusion here worth clearing up, because it makes families think a single door opens on a single birthday. In the UK, under data protection law, thirteen is the age at which a child can give their own consent for their data to be processed, which is why most social platforms set thirteen in their terms. The UK Chief Medical Officers looked at that threshold in their 2019 commentary and said they support it. Thirteen is about data and accounts. It is not the age at which a person is allowed to own a telephone, and no such age exists.

Translated to your house: a twelve-year-old can have a phone to call you, message you and find their way home without any of this being relevant. What the law speaks to is the accounts. And that is genuinely useful news, because it separates two decisions that most families fuse into one and then regret. Giving a phone and giving Instagram do not have to happen on the same day, or in the same year.

If you take one practical thing from this article, take that. It is the highest-leverage move available to you and it costs nothing.

Smartphone or a basic phone?

Short version: a basic phone genuinely solves the problem and often lasts about six weeks, because the child carrying the only brick in the year group experiences it as a punishment rather than a plan.

The temptation is obvious. It calls, it texts, it has no TikTok. In practice the pressure to upgrade arrives quickly and arrives with a grievance attached. You have not avoided the conversation, you have postponed it and added resentment to it.

The exception is when the basic phone is a class norm rather than a personal sentence, which brings you back to the previous section. A brick among bricks is fine. A brick alone is a countdown.

And this is the point at which most articles wish you luck and leave. They give you an age, they give you it depends on maturity, and they stop. The difficult part starts immediately afterwards.

The turn: it is not the age, it is how you hand it over

Picture two children. Same age, same day, same handset. The first gets it wide open. They switch it on, they install what they like, and from that afternoon your home becomes a daily negotiation about putting it down. The second gets it prepared: the accounts that are not for now are simply not there, the rules were agreed before the box was opened, and the adults in the house are visibly living by something similar.

Same age. Opposite outcome.

Which is why what age should a kid get a phone is the wrong question to agonise over. Age is the easy half: look at your child, ask the five questions above, talk to four other parents, pick a point. What decides the next three years is the state that phone is in when it arrives, and whether anything holds when everyone is tired.

The classic mistake is to put the whole load on the iPhone's own parental controls. Set them up, absolutely, and we have written how to set up parental controls on an iPhone step by step without skipping anything. But they have a known weakness: they get around. Restart the phone, change the clock, use a Focus mode, learn the passcode over your shoulder. That is not your failure or your child's. Software always leaves a gap and children find gaps faster than adults do. If you have already been through this, you know the shape of it, and a child who gets around every control you set stops being a technical problem and becomes a nightly one.

The one barrier that does not fall to a restart is a physical one. That is the entire idea behind Monk.

How Monk lets you hand over a first phone already prepared

To reopen a blocked app you have to scan the Monk. Every time.

First, what Monk is not. It is not a parental control. It does not monitor, it does not track, it does not read anyone's messages. And it is not something you operate on your child. They operate it. That difference changes everything, because taking a phone away works for one evening, whereas learning to put one down works for a life.

Monk is a physical device, about the size of an AirTag, magnetic, no battery, that blocks the apps you choose on an iPhone. The difference from any control that lives inside the phone fits in one sentence: there is no soft unlock. No passcode to guess, no restart, no clock change, no Focus mode to slip through. There are three emergency unlocks in the app and they are finite — a spare key, not a back door. If the Monk stays in the kitchen while homework happens, the decision has already been taken and nobody has to take it again at seven o'clock. That is not a comment on anyone's willpower. Every app on that phone was built by teams of talented people to hold attention, and you do not beat that with resolutions. You beat it by changing the room.

What does that look like on an ordinary Tuesday? Your son monks himself to do his homework: taps the phone to the Monk, the apps close, and the evening belongs to maths. He monks himself to sleep, and the night is a night. On Saturday the whole table eats monked, you included and preferably first. None of those scenes involves a lecture. They involve a physical gesture that shuts a door without an argument.

We are not going to promise magic. On iOS nothing is a perfect wall, and our own FAQ says so: Safari always leaves a crack. What Monk kills is the automatic gesture, the hand opening the app before the thought arrives, which is most of the problem most days. And when the closing gesture belongs to them, hunting for the back door stops being an interesting game.

What Monk is, and how to use it with a first phone

Monk is a Spanish brand built around giving time back. The product is the Monk: a physical device you scan with an iPhone. It works on iPhone only, iOS 16.2 and up, with no Android version, and we would rather tell you that before you buy anything than after. Calls and the camera work at all times, and there are three emergency unlocks for actual emergencies. One payment, app included, no subscription, thirty days to send it back.

Handing over a prepared first phone does not start with their handset. It starts with yours, in this order:

  1. Live it first. Monk yourself in front of them for a few days before the phone arrives. Your children do not need you to take anything off them. They need to see you without it. Children do not do what they are told, they do what they watch.
  2. Let them try it. One dinner with everyone monked. One homework session with the apps shut. Short, specific, no speech attached.
  3. Let them own it. They monk themselves to study, to sleep, to be with their friends. The day the gesture is theirs there is no war left to win, and that is the habit that travels with them at twenty.

No spyware, no reading their messages, no fight every evening. You set the rules and Monk holds them: not for now stops being a contest between the two of you and becomes a rule that stands up on its own. Worth saying plainly: the first three days are the uncomfortable ones, for them and for you. That passes, and it passes faster if you went first.

If you want to do the groundwork properly, the months before the handover are their own subject, and we wrote about them here: what to sort out before your child's first phone.

Frequently asked questions

Is 11 too young for a phone?

Not automatically, and it depends far more on what the phone is for than on the number. A phone at eleven for calls and location is a different object from one with social accounts open on it. The more useful test is readiness: does your child come to you when something goes wrong, can they put a thing down when they said they would, and what is the actual need you are solving. As a reference point rather than a rule, the Wait Until 8th pledge asks parents to hold off until at least the end of 8th grade, around thirteen or fourteen.

What age can a child have Instagram, TikTok or WhatsApp?

Thirteen, in practice, because that is where most platforms set their own terms and it lines up with the age at which a child in the UK can consent to their own data being processed. The UK Chief Medical Officers said in 2019 that they support that threshold. Note what it is and is not: it is a rule about accounts and data, not about owning a phone. You can hand over a phone earlier for calling and getting organised, and keep the accounts closed until later, which is the single most useful separation available to you.

How do I set rules for a first phone that actually hold?

Agree a small number of clear ones (which apps, which hours, where it charges overnight) and back them with something more durable than your word at the end of a tiring day. The iPhone's parental controls are the first step, but remember they get bypassed. With a physical barrier like the Monk the rule is held by an object rather than by an argument: a blocked app only opens by scanning the Monk, and that is not renegotiated nightly. You set the rules, Monk holds them.

What if my child is angry because their friends have everything?

That is a normal reaction and it does not mean you have got it wrong. You can give them what they need to stay inside the social life (calling, messaging, making plans) without opening the apps that would take their evenings. And the most effective thing you can do about the anger is not aimed at your child at all: talk to other parents in the class. When several families are holding a similar line, the complaint stops being that you are unreasonable and becomes a fact about the year group, which is much easier for a twelve-year-old to carry.

If you want to keep pulling the thread, it helps to read what the evidence says about phone bans in schools, the other front where a first phone gets tested.

monk.

Don't hand it over open. Hand it over prepared

You are going to give them a phone. Fine, it is your call and you are already making it well by reading about it. One thing only: don't hand it over open, and don't hand it over alone. Hand it over prepared, with your own example already visible, and talk to four other parents before you do. That is the difference between three years of arguments and a habit they still have at twenty.

See how Monk works

iPhone, iOS 16.2+ · Doesn't monitor · Works by example, not by force · Monk currently ships within Spain — join the list for the UK and the rest of the EU

Back to blog